ଉଇକିପିଡ଼ିଆ:Identifying reliable sources
|this page documents an english wikipedia content guideline. it is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply. any substantive edit to this page should reflect consensus. when in doubt, discuss first on the talk page.|
|ଅଳ୍ପରେ ଏହି ପୃଷ୍ଠା: this guideline discusses how to identify reliable sources. the policy on sourcing is |
assume good faith
categories, lists, and templates
|list of policies and guidelines|
wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources; and, all majority and significant minority views that appear in these sources should be covered by these articles (see
the reliability of a source depends on context. each source must be carefully weighed to judge whether it is reliable for the statement being made and is the best such source for that context. in general, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable the publication. sources should directly support the information as it is presented in an article, and should be appropriate to the claims made. if a topic has no reliable sources, wikipedia should not have an article on it.
this guideline discusses the reliability of various types of sources. the policy on sourcing is
contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.
in the event of a contradiction between this page and our policies regarding sourcing and attribution, the policy takes priority and editors should seek to resolve the discrepancy. other policies relevant to sourcing are