Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates

This star, with one point broken, symbolizes the featured candidates on Wikipedia.

Featured pictures are images that add significantly to articles, either by illustrating article content particularly well, or being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article. Taking the adage that "a picture is worth a thousand words", the images featured on Wikipedia:Featured pictures should illustrate a Wikipedia article in such a way as to add significantly to that article, according to the featured picture criteria.

Promoting an image

If you believe an image should be featured, create a subpage (use the "For Nominations" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section.

For promotion, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-third majority in support, including the nominator and/or creator of the image; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets.

All users may comment. However, only those who have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and with at least 100 edits will be included in the numerical count. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. Nominations started in December are given three extra days, due to the holidays slowing down activity here.

The archive contains all opinions and comments collected for candidate nominations and their nomination results.

If you nominate an image here, please consider also uploading and nominating it at Commons to help ensure that the pictures can be used not just in the English Wikipedia but on all other Wikimedia projects as well.

Delisting an image

A featured picture can be nominated for delisting if you feel it no longer lives up to featured picture standards. You may also request a featured picture be replaced with a superior image. Create a subpage (use the "For Delists" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section.

Please leave a note on the talk page of the original FPC nominator (and creator/uploader, if appropriate) to let them know the delisting is being debated. The user may be able to address the issues and avoid the delisting of the picture.

For delisting, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers supporting a delist or replace, and the consensus is in its favor, it will be delisted from Wikipedia:Featured pictures. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-third majority in support, including the nominator. Note that anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. However, images are sometimes delisted despite having fewer than five in support of their removal, and there is currently no consensus on how best to handle delist closures, except that:.If the image to be delisted is not used in any articles by the time of closure, it must be delisted. If it is added to articles during the nomination, at least one week's stability is required for the nomination to be closed as "Kept". The nomination may be suspended if a week hasn't yet passed to give the rescue a chance.

Outside of the nominator, all voters are expected to have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and to have made a minimum of 100 edits. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. As with regular nominations, delist nominations are given three extra days to run if started in December.

  • Note that delisting an image does not mean deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article(s).
Step 1:
Evaluate

Evaluate the merit of a nomination against the featured picture criteria. Most users reference terms from this page when evaluating nominations.

Step 2:
Create a subpage
For Nominations

To create a subpage of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates for your nomination, add a title for the image you want to nominate in the field below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Labrador Retriever) and click the "Create new nomination" button.


For Delists (or Delist & Replace)

To create a subpage for your delist, add a title for the image you want to delist/replace in the field below and click the "Create new delist nomination" button.


Step 3:
Transclude and link

direct link).

How to comment for Candidate Images

  • Write Support, if you approve of the picture. A reason is optional.
  • Write Oppose, followed by your reasoning, if you disapprove of the picture. All objections should be accompanied by a specific rationale that, if addressed, would make you support the image. If your concern is one that can only be addressed by the creator, and if they haven't nominated or commented on the image, and if they are a Wikipedian, you should notify them directly.
  • You can weak support or weak oppose instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion.
    • To change your opinion, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.
  • If you think a nominated image obviously fails the featured picture criteria, write Speedy close followed by your reasons. Nominations may be closed early if this is the case.
Recommendations added early in the process may be disregarded if they do not address concerns and/or improvements that arise later in the debate. Reviewers are advised to monitor the progress of a nomination and update their votes accordingly.
Prior to giving an opinion, the image should be assessed on its quality as displayed at full size (high-resolution) in an image editing program. Please note that the images are only displayed at thumbnail size on this page. The thumbnail links to the image description page which, in turn, links to the high-resolution version.

How to comment for Delist Images

  • Write Keep, followed by your reasons for keeping the picture.
  • Write Delist, followed by your reasons for delisting the picture.
  • Write Delist and Replace if you believe the image should be replaced by a better picture.
  • You can weak keep, weak delist or weak delist and replace instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion.
    • To change your opinion, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.
Please remember to be civil, not to bite the newbies and to comment on the image, not the person.

You may find the glossary useful when you encounter acronyms or jargon in other voters' comments. You can also link to it by using {{FPCgloss}}.

Editing candidates

If you feel you could improve a candidate by image editing, please feel free to do so, but do not overwrite or remove the original. Instead, upload your edit with a different file name (e.g., add "edit" to the file name), and display it below the original nomination. Edits should be appropriately captioned in sequential order (e.g., Edit 1, Edit 2, etc), and describe the modifications that have been applied.

Is my monitor adjusted correctly?

Gray contrast test image.svg
In a discussion about the brightness of an image, it is necessary to know if the computer display is properly adjusted. Displays differ greatly in their ability to show shadow detail. There are four dark grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display shadow detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings. Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal shadow detail. Please take this into account when voting.
Highlight test image.svg
Displays also differ greatly in their ability to show highlight detail. There are light grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display highlight detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings (probably reduce the contrast setting). Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal highlight detail. Please take this into account when voting.
Colortest.png
On a gamma-adjusted display, the four circles in the color image blend into the background when seen from a few feet (roughly 75–150 cm) away. If they do not, you could adjust the gamma setting (found in the computer's settings, not on the display), until they do. This may be very difficult to attain, and a slight error is not detrimental. Uncorrected PC displays usually show the circles darker than the background.
Note that on most consumer LCD displays (laptop or flat screen), viewing angle strongly affects these images. Correct adjustment on one part of the screen might be incorrect on another part for a stationary head position. Click on the images for more technical information. If possible, calibration with a hardware monitor calibrator is recommended.

Current nominations

Bush Lying in State

Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2018 at 07:28:00 (UTC)

OriginalGeorge H.W. Bush lays in state in the Rotunda of the United States Capitol on December 3, 2018.
Reason
This is a well-composed, non-manipulated image that is used on two pages — one of which is high-trafficked — and captures an important historical moment. The last event of this type was in 2006 and did not produce an image of this caliber. The event was well-documented and the content of the image verifiable.
Articles in which this image appears
State funerals in the United States, Death and state funeral of George H. W. Bush
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
Creator
Maria I. Alvarez
  • Support as nominatorChetsford (talk) 07:28, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Oppose - overly compressed, noticeable JPEG artifacts. MER-C 10:46, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Oppose – Far too distant viewpoint. A much closer shot dominated by the coffin might be usable (although personally, I've already seen too much about Mr. Bush's decease).Sca (talk) 14:54, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Withdraw as nom ... I think the above two comments are observant ones and, given that there are several other good photos of this event out there in the ether, I'd like to withdraw this one and evaluate options for a better submission. Chetsford (talk) 16:55, 11 December 2018 (UTC)



Emma Smith DeVoe

Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2018 at 03:02:39 (UTC)

OriginalEmma Smith DeVoe
Reason
I should probably mention right now that we're moving towards the hundredth anniversary of the passing of the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution (which passed in 1920), so I'm trying to help us prepare to be a resource beforehand, since all those articles are about to become a lot more trafficked. So.. you know. ANYWAY! Emma Smith DeVoe was one of the big suffragettes in the western states, and one of the leaders of the campaign in Washington that got women there suffrage 10 years before the rest of the country (Suffrage more or less worked its way went west to east). So, important. The state of our articles are actually rather chaotic, by the way. Take Women's_suffrage_movement_in_Washington which is horribly incomplete, or Women's suffrage in states of the United States, which leaves out half the states. Well, as I said, it's a work in progress.

Anyway, my point, efore I got sidetrackked is this appears to be the best image of her, especially as the archives of the Library of Congress collect a lot of the suffrage movement organizations' archives.

Articles in which this image appears
Emma Smith DeVoe
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator
James & Bushnell, Seattle; restored by Adam Cuerden



Alex White

Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2018 at 09:16:39 (UTC)

'OriginalAlex White is an American author of science fiction. Their books include a series named The Salvagers, published by Orbit Books, and the Alien novel Alien: The Cold Forge, published by Titan Publishing Group.
Reason
A professional portrait of a notable individual.
Articles in which this image appears
Alex White (author)
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator
Kyle Cassidy
  • Support as nominatorJosh Milburn (talk) 09:16, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Oppose not notable. Recently created article of insignificant author. Probably advertising. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:14, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
    • Well, the article passes WP:GNG, so we really should be considering this on the image. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 18:46, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Other than some odd bits of lint (which I'm so tempted to photoshop out), this looks great. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 18:48, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Support I agree that the subject is borderline for notability, but probably is on the right side of the line. This photo is a great portrait: it clearly shows the subject, is well executed and visually interesting and gives viewers a hint of their personality. Nick-D (talk) 23:05, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Comment – White's 400-word article is little more than a stub. Sca (talk) 14:31, 9 December 2018 (UTC)



Replace: Under the horse chestnut tree

Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2018 at 18:11:11 (UTC)

Under the horse chestnut tree
Proposed replacement
Reason
Replaced in articles with higher resolution version. If you're wondering about the colors: at least 162 originals were made through the drypoint printing process. Both images are competent reproductions from different originals.
Articles this image appears in
Mary Cassatt, Mona Bismarck American Center, List of works by Mary Cassatt
Previous nomination/s
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Under the Horse Chestnut Tree
Nominator
MER-C
  • ReplaceMER-C 18:11, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Replace Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 19:28, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Replace – per museum website: [1]. Bammesk (talk) 18:20, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Replace – per above. --Janke | Talk 22:04, 9 December 2018 (UTC)



LED matrix (2)

Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2018 at 17:36:31 (UTC)

Original – Composite image of a 11x44 LED matrix name tag display using SMD LEDs. Top: A little over half of the 21x86 mm display. Center: Close-up of 0.8x1.6mm LEDs in ambient light. Bottom: LEDs in their own red light.
Reason
Didn't meet quorum last time (ended up as 4-0), but I still feel this merits the star. The original nomination reason was "Very high EV, good quality bellows macro photo (no DOF problem), shows even the minuscule LED chips and gold bonding wires inside the tiny 1.6 x 0.8 mm transparent surface-mount packages. Also shows a wider image of the matrix, as well as LEDs in their own light.".
Articles in which this image appears
Light-emitting diode, Surface-mount technology
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Materials science
Creator
Janke
  • Support as nominatorMER-C 17:36, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Honestly, the only issue I could see is that it might be better composition as two seperate images, or as a different sort of inset, but it's clearly worthy. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 17:46, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Support by author of photo. Thanks for the re-nom. We seldom see purely "technical" FPCs... --Janke | Talk 13:42, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Support – good detail, well done. Bammesk (talk) 18:00, 9 December 2018 (UTC)



Skibobbing

Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2018 at 17:22:56 (UTC)

Original – Austrian National Championship 2018 in Skibobbing. Skibobbing is a winter sport involving a bicycle-type frame attached to skis instead of wheels and sometimes a set of foot skis. Sarah Gruber from club ASKÖ SBC Linz doing the giant slalom.
Reason
why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first)
Articles in which this image appears
Skibobbing
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Sport
Creator
Isiwal
  • Support as nominatorTomer T (talk) 17:22, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Support - That is one nice action shot. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 19:29, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Support. Great shot. I don't consider JPEG compression having a hard time in some areas to be substantive. MER-C 20:46, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Support - Awesome one : DreamSparrow Chat 15:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • SupportBammesk (talk) 18:17, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Support - incredible! Chetsford (talk) 07:30, 11 December 2018 (UTC)



John Lorimer Worden with the Tiffany & Co sword

Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2018 at 07:50:00 (UTC)

OriginalJohn Lorimer Worden, with the Tiffany & Co. sword given to him after the battle of the Monitor and Virginia which was stolen from the Naval Academy in 1931.
Reason
Illustrates a major section of his article, providing context not available without this image. By the way, sorry there's a lot of nominations. Part of it is that I am pretty productive, part of it's that having a crazy drunk shouting in your hallway all night gives you a lot of free time to do something with, and part of it's coming back after a long wikibreak, and eyeing over all the nearly-finished projects from before and wanting to clear it out. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 07:56, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Articles in which this image appears
John Lorimer Worden
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Military
Creator
Mathew Brady, restored by Adam Cuerden
  • Support as nominatorAdam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 07:50, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Great photo with strong EV, and a successful restoration. The cat under the chair is a bit random! Nick-D (talk) 23:07, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Support. MER-C 11:27, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Comment – we have a FP in the infobox, same setting, attire, pose, more resolution and sharper on subject himself. I assume this nom is for the sword section of the article. The sword is somewhat out of focus though. Bammesk (talk) 18:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
    • There doesn't appear to be any other pictures of him with the sword, though. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 05:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)



Delist and Replace: Assassination of Abraham Lincoln

Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2018 at 03:42:01 (UTC)

Current FP
Suggested replacement: Restored by Adam Cuerden, in colour.
Reason
The Library of Congress have a large, clearer copy of this available... but it's still the black and white image we see here. I think it's time to accept what's already standard practice on Wikipedia: The coloured version is by far preferred. I have not replaced any of the original image. I HAVE replaced the suggested replacement with a restored version, as I felt I should do the bit of work needed to really make it excellent.
Articles this image appears in
Current FP: None for at least a few months (See WT:FPC. Suggested replacement: Assassination of Abraham Lincoln, John Wilkes Booth, +1
Previous nomination/s
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Currier & Ives - Lincoln is the only one, as far as I see.
Nominator
Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs
  • Delist and replaceAdam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 03:42, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Replace. MER-C 10:04, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Keep Original better Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:19, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
    • I'm afraid, per the rules, that's not actually an option if it's not used in articles. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 18:30, 8 December 2018 (UTC)


Enceladus (mosaic)

Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2018 at 06:48:36 (UTC)

Original – South polar vantage of Enceladus's anti-Saturn hemisphere, using a false color scheme in which fractured areas show up as blue
Reason
Good EV, high resolution
Articles in which this image appears
Enceladus, etc.
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Looking out
Creator
NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute
  • Support as nominatorThe NMI User (talk) 06:48, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
  • While there are a bunch of stitching errors, this being an official NASA image rather indicates we're unlikely to get better, so Support, with possibility of a delist and replace if better ones emerge. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 14:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Support halfheartedly per Adam. Being a mosaic from NASA, true, we can't ask for more. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:09, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Comment Why is this not the lead image in the main article? Mattximus (talk) 22:46, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
    • @Mattximus: I think the natural colour one makes sense for the lead. This is false colour and used to illustrate an aspect of Enceladus. If the article was, say, Cracking of Enceladus's surface then it would be the lead. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 23:04, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
      • Agreed. MER-C 17:48, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak support per above. Cassini-Huygens has been decommissioned, and there is no better equivalent image on [2]. MER-C 17:48, 7 December 2018 (UTC)



Millicent Fawcett

Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2018 at 02:19:15 (UTC)

OriginalMillicent Fawcett, suffragist, governor of Bedford College, London, co-founder of Newnham College, Cambridge, president of the National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies, and, 1901 she was appointed to lead the British government's commission to South Africa investigating conditions in the concentration camps that had been created there in the wake of the Second Boer War. Oh, and she was the first woman to get a statue in Parliament Square this year.
Reason
Another fine, well-sourced image that vastly improves on what was there before, to whit, [3]
Articles in which this image appears
Millicent Fawcett and (in no particular order as she seems fairly prominent in all of them) August 1901, Conservative and Unionist Women's Franchise Association, International Alliance of Women, List of suffragists and suffragettes, National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies, South African Wars (1879–1915)
FP category for this image
WP:Featured pictures/People/Political, maybe? She was kind of a lot of things.
Creator
Bain News Service, restored by Adam Cuerden
  • Support as nominatorAdam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 02:19, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
  • SupportBammesk (talk) 02:51, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
  • SupportDreamSparrow Chat 04:50, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Support - insanely high resolution, good EV. Kaldari (talk) 00:00, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Support. MER-C 04:08, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Support - Per nom. Mattximus (talk) 22:49, 6 December 2018 (UTC)



Robert Edward Lee

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2018 at 22:07:39 (UTC)

OriginalGeneral in Chief Robert E. Lee
Reason
High resolution and lede image for a key figure in the American Civil War. Taken in 1864.
Articles in which this image appears
Robert E. Lee
FP category for this image
People/Military
Creator
Photographed by Julian Vannerson, restored by Orionist
  • Support as nominatorWalk Like an Egyptian (talk) 22:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Comment I like most of this, but what on earth happened to the background? It's very posterised. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 22:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Oppose - the original is here,but I think [4] is a better choice as a lead image for this subject. MER-C 18:21, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
    • @MER-C: Really? I always favour photographs over sketches like that, where possible. Too much idealisation/simplification. I don't mind paintings as much,especially contemporary ones, as they give details like hair colour that aren't in photos. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 18:49, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
      • I had missed that aspect; I was focusing on the background content. However, I agree with your observation about the background of the nominated image. Also, the tie has been butchered by blocky artifacts. MER-C 21:02, 8 December 2018 (UTC)



Carrie Chapman Catt

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2018 at 17:48:43 (UTC)

Reason
I have a vague memory - remembering I have been on wikibreak for two years - that last time I checked, there wasn't anything really good for Carrie Chapman Catt. Now there's loads and loads. I can only presume that the Library of Congress went back and uploaded higher-resolution scans of things. This isn't the lead in her article, because facing right is awkward for a lead image. I might go back and do the lead image as well sometime, but I do think this is the best image of her out there, full of character and liveliness.

I have taken the liberty of changing it from awkward truncated oval to rectangular - given the chiascuro lighting effects popular around 1910-1920, this really doesn't involve much guesswork; everything fades out to darkness at the bottom anyway, and there's basically no detail there anyway.

Articles in which this image appears
Carrie Chapman Catt, National American Woman Suffrage Association. I'm sure it could be used elsewhere.
FP category for this image
Any objections to Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political? It's going to be some subdivision of People, anyway.
Creator
Joint Suffrage Procession Committee(?), restored by Adam Cuerden
  • Support as nominatorAdam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 17:48, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
  • SupportBammesk (talk) 02:41, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
  • SupportDreamSparrow Chat 11:28, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Comment If you think it's the best image of her, would it not be better places as a the lead image in the main article? Mattximus (talk) 22:52, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
    • @Mattximus: There is the idea that faces should be looking towards the article text. This means a right-facing image ideally should be on the left-hand side, which precludes it being the lead image. But there are reasons for it to be the lead as well - it's the clearest and easiest to interpret picture I could find of her. I'll leave it to others where it ends up, though. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 02:27, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
      • Would a horizontal flip help? MER-C 20:40, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
        • Pretty sure that's explicitly forbidden in one of the guidelines. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 20:41, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Support. MER-C 20:40, 7 December 2018 (UTC)



Replace: The Coronation of Napoleon

Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2018 at 03:33:19 (UTC)

Proposed replacement
Reason
Superseded by higher resolution scan.
Articles this image appears in
The Coronation of Napoleon etc.
Previous nomination/s
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/The Coronation of Napoleon
Nominator
MER-C
  • ReplaceMER-C 03:33, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Question The source is just given as "art database": How certain can we be about these colours? Otherwise, other than reflections (which are normal enough for this sort of reproduction, but very slightly less prominent in the old), this seems quite a bit superior Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 05:15, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
    For comparison, I offer [5] and [6]. This reproduction seems to be between the two in terms of yellowness. MER-C 06:27, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
  • ReplaceBammesk (talk) 16:23, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Comment – I'm no expert, but FWIW the French Wiki article uses the darker version. – Sca (talk) 16:47, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
  • I'm cool with either one. TomStar81 (Talk) 09:14, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
@TomStar81: To be clear for purposes of closing, that means you would support a delist and replace, OR keeping the original? Kind of like a support either vote? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.2% of all FPs 17:18, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Correct. TomStar81 (Talk) 17:20, 2 December 2018 (UTC)


Other Languages
oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча: Vikipediya:Tanlangan tasvir nomzodlari